The Tulsa shooting is one event I heard
of, and my reaction to it was anger. The fact that an unarmed man was shot –
most likely because of some racial prejudice held by the officer – is angering.
I will admit that I cannot imagine the kind of pressure police officers face,
but investigations should be held in ever situation of a civilian being shot –
all biases being put aside. At the very least Ms. Shelby should be losing her
job – because of lack of judgment on her part. Her bail ended up being $50,000,
and this amount is minimal compared to the bail that would have been given to
an African American male.
I heard about the Tulsa shooting
originally from family, and then by reading about the event in the Wall Street
Journal. I believe that these sources shape my opinion very much. My family and
I are always saddened by the news of an unexpected death, especially at the
hands of higher authorities. My family has also always had a huge impact on me
as a person. I have always enjoyed the Wall Street Journal, but this is because
I believe that for the most part they try to present more facts than opinion.
While I know that Wall Street Journal does have it’s own agenda, but I believe
that the way this news source presents the facts that they have are in a very
formal way.
Other news outlets do present
things in different ways. For example, Fox News most likely came to the rescue
for Ms. Shelby – in a way that is most likely aggressive towards African Americans.
MSNBC is probably more aggressive toward the police force. I think that every
news source will present their side of the story to push their own agenda.
Sometimes true fact can be replaced by the agendas of news sources.
Work
Cited:
Mahtani,
Shibani. "Tulsa Police Officer Booked, Released in Terence Crutcher
Shooting Case." WSJ. Wsj.com, 23 Sept. 2016. Web. 27 Sept. 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/tulsa-police-officer-booked-released-in-terence-crutcher-shooting-case-1474633452.